On January 30, the court ordered that the petition of Vee Jay Records to dissolve the temporary injunction be denied without holding a hearing on the motion.
#Capitol records contact number verification
Along with this, a petition to dissolve the injunction was presented alleging that the original verification on behalf of Capitol Records was faulty inasmuch as the person verifying "could not have knowledge of the facts alleged therein, particularly those facts regarding the relationship between defendants, Vee Jay Records, Inc.
On the same day a verified answer was filed for Vee Jay Records controverting the allegations in Capitol's original complaint. On January 23, defendant petitioned for a substitution of attorneys and the court so ordered. *471 On January 15, the court ordered: (1) that the "motion to strike filed by Vee Jay Records, Inc., defendant, is overruled and denied, and said defendant is ordered to answer said plaintiff's complaint within thirty days" and (2) that Vee Jay Records be enjoined until further order of the court. On that same day Transglobal filed its answer admitting all the allegations in the plaintiff's complaint except that which pertained to the financial condition of defendant, Vee Jay Records. On January 15, upon petition of plaintiff, Transglobal Music Co., Inc. This complaint was accompanied by an affidavit of Jay Lasker, Vice-President of Vee Jay Records, which may or may not have been verified. Capitol Records, Inc., Swan Records, Inc. On January 15th, defendant appeared with a motion entitled "motion to strike" which alleged a valid existing contract between Vee Jay Records and defendant, Transglobal Music Co., Inc., and which motion incorporated by reference the complaint in a certain cause of action filed in the Supreme Court of New York, entitled Vee Jay Records, Inc. The defendant, Vee Jay Records, for various reasons, was given until January 15th to file an answer. On January 13, 1964, Capitol Records, plaintiff herein, presented its verified complaint for injunction followed on January 14 by a motion to the court for a temporary injunction. We are also vacating our own order staying the force and effect of the injunction.īefore reasoning the above conclusions, a chronological background of the procedure is in order. We believe that the order denying the motion to dissolve the injunction should be reversed and is now left undisposed of. We believe that the order granting the temporary injunction was properly issued and should be affirmed. Subsequent to the last mentioned order this court entered an order on February 5, 1964, staying the force *470 and effect of the injunction pending argument of the appeal from the denial of the motion to dissolve.īefore proceeding further, we will indicate the disposition of this appeal. Vee Jay Records, Inc., to dissolve the temporary injunction issued on January 15, 1964.
This is an interlocutory appeal from an order entered on January 15, 1964, granting a temporary injunction "restraining and enjoining until further order of the court, the defendant, Vee Jay Records, Inc., its agents, attorneys and servants from manufacturing, selling, distributing or otherwise disposing of or advertising the sale by it, its agents, attorneys and servants of any and all recordings by the vocal group commonly referred to as the `Beatles'" and from an order entered on January 30, 1964, denying the petition of defendant. JUSTICE BRYANT delivered the opinion of the court: Wittenstrom, Jr., of counsel), for appellant.Īrvey, Hodes & Mantynband, of Chicago (Sidney R. *469 Sidley, Austin, Burgess & Smith, of Chicago (Robert A. Illinois Appellate Court First District, Second Division. Vee Jay Records, Inc., Defendant-Appellant.
0 kommentar(er)
